Originally Posted by gbb357
THAT'S WHY I HIGHLIGHTED ALL THREE DATA POINTS TO BEGIN WITH. EVEN IN MY ORIGINAL POST IT WAS ALREADY HIGHLIGHTED. AND I DID'NT NEED ENGINEERING BACKGROUND. BTW, I HAD A FEELING YOU WHERE OF SOME ENGINEERING BACKGROUND, YOU REMIND ME OF MY COUSIN AND UNCLE. HERE IT IS AGAIN, NOT JUST 0-60 BUT 0-100 AND 1/4 MILE AS WELL. DO YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE NOW.
0-60= 4.5/ 4.8/ 4.84
0-100= 11.2/ 12.0/ 11.91
1/4mile = 13.1/ 13.4/ 13.5
Sure the M3 simulation vs. 40k mile test are very close, still not dead on.
My comments are aimed at the complete set of IS-F results from C&D vs. simulation, not the E46 M3. You keep focusing on the 0-60 difference between C&D and simulation for the IS-F.