View Single Post
      04-29-2013, 06:27 PM   #4265
druu
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
228
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 AW e92 335i xdrive Msport
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maeiourk View Post
I know I won't! I'm just worried as some reviews I've read has some negative thoughts about it. Like the sharpness is not being consistent. Sometimes it would be sharp, sometimes it doesn't. So now I'm considering the 16-35 f/2.8L, 50 f/1.2L, and 70-200 f/2.8 combo instead.



Yea, I'll probably do that if I'm going to buy a used lens. Thank you!
I think QC on the 24-70s may be bad at times. A lot of people reported that the original 24-70 had soft copies. They probably just need to be calibrated (there's a lens rentals article about that). the 24-70 is supposed to be 70-200 II sharp now. Which is insane for a mid range walk around zoom. and sharper than some primes now according to imatest results.