View Single Post
      01-22-2013, 12:12 PM   #43
happos2
Dingleberries
18
Rep
1,182
Posts

 
Drives: Gray E92 M3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munit View Post
These are one of those situations that if you simply step back and use common sense you will see that its really not sensible that bmw M would use a restrictive elbow if there was 10hp on the table from using a slightly larger diameter pipe. The diamter being smaller is not necessarily more restrictive. Its likely calculated based on desired intake air velocity whichi requires a certain diameter. Larger diameter means slower moving air. So while it may move "more" air, the air is slower and would take more time. This intake does not have a restriction for air in totally stock form.

Evidence is in the GTS 4.4 stroked engine which uses the identical intake box as the stock s65 m3. Clearly a 4.4L if anything requires more air and the stock setup provides enough air for that so our stocker engine has more than enough air.

I think a dyno gain is for the filter only but to each his own. M would not leave 10hp on the table if it were a matter of tweaking the intake elbow diameter. Just makes zero sense
These are one of those situtions where it doesn't matter to you. Let the OP spend his own money! Maybe he is a multi-millionaire where $400 is penny change to him. And people care for aesthetics sometimes, not everything is about power. The forum has looked at this many times an most people are in agreement that there is really no noticable change in power (1-2 whp at most, probably not that because we aren't even that good at measuring that difference). I have now read multiple post from you and all you have typed was complete crap just prying for arguments.

Anyways, OP, thank you for the write up. It looks very nice.