View Single Post
      12-27-2012, 10:01 PM   #30
Wendall
***Major MammelToe
 
Wendall's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 M3 SG coupe
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Orange County, CA

Posts: 1,146
iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by italyix View Post
Yeah ty, math was never my strong point. Im not saying to run 1200lb in the rear. If one plans to match the rear spring with the front, the equivalent oem location would require a 1200lb spring to match the front, hence why a rear coil over makes sense. Now, will the towers crack? Idk, but GTS runs a rear coil over.
I'm not the most knowledgeable person on suspension set ups but idk why anyone would want to match the front effect wheel rate with the rear on the e9x M3s? Especially with the weight of the engine slung over the front axel. Im guessing thats why M3SQRD used the OEM "wheel rate" ratio (1.70:1 front to rear) of approx ~460 lbf/in Front and ~270 lbf/in Rear. Hence brings you to around a 800lb rear spring for oem locations and ~ 300lb rear spring for a coilover rear location.

I would think having a 1:1 effective spring rates on the front and the back would be really stiff in the rear.
__________________
E92 M3 SG DCT - AA Filter, Verstraβe Paddles, ECS SS, MH race stud, Stoptech BBK, MR Exhaust,RE Pulley, BPM Tune,Euro bumper and GTS lip, Euro MDM & DCT, KW CS, Recaro PP, TMS Soild Diff Mounts, MRF solid subframe mounts, GTS aero, RPM track built motor.

Wendall is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote