Originally Posted by MiddleAgedAl
This seems to be an unvarnished, candid portrayal of these people's honest, unscripted position on a certain issue. The reporter encountered these people on a street, already acting of their own volition. Not everything is the result of cold, calculating racism.
It may seem to be unvarnished, and candid but you really don't know that do you? It could easily have been staged. Wouldn't be the first time for such a thing. Andrew Breitbart comes to mind.
I only saw one person speaking so I'm curious why you might assume you know what "these people's" position is?
... See how dog whistle politics works? You've already made a lot of assumptions and you think you know what a lot of people are thinking when you've never heard them speak.