View Single Post
      07-16-2012, 05:34 PM   #50
Drives: '11 M3
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: East Coast

Posts: 607
iTrader: (0)

Originally Posted by MediaArtist View Post
Oh really. Then what's the truth behind FHA delinquencies increasing 27%?

That makes no sense. PMI doesn't exist to "offset the lack of equity", it's a premium charged to cover the risk of a borrower defaulting on a high LTV loan which is guaranteed by FHA, and IMO, it isn't enough because FHA is still failing and severely insolvent. Paying 3% on a home and financing the rest simply doesn't work, it's as dangerous as the 0% loans that wiped out the sub-prime market. If 3% down worked, FHA would be solvent, and wouldn't be at risk of failing. There's a reason why the private lending industry won't do 3% down payments, it's because they know it doesn't work. If you can't afford 20% down, and reserve funds, then you should be looking at a smaller, or less expensive house. Your advice is absolutely horrible.
Yes it does. The less you put down, the higher risk you are to a lender. 20% is a sizeable amount to put into a home that's worth $300k. That's called EQUITY! That's less of the lender's money they have to risk on your ass if you die, default or otherwise on your newly acquired home. A PMI covers them.

Regarding your FHA comments: the increase in FHA delinquencies is on par with the rate of increase in delinquencies with conventional loans. Lol. and???

Income/debt ratio is the biggest determining factor on affordability of a home, and not a big down payment is which does little to
Affect your monthly expenses. Cash-on-hand is what most Americans don't have. Throwing $60k away on a liability like a home when that money can secure your mortgage for a few years alone is just plan stupid. Pay yourself first. You have 30 years to worry about your mortgage, then your lifetime to pay taxes.
48Laws is offline  
Reply With Quote