Originally Posted by bruce.augenstein@comcast.
And here we have the definitive fanboy attitude.
I say "My ONLY point is that I think the M guys dropped the ball in this one area. Otherwise, the car is damned close to being a paragon."
And you say that I (along with some other guy) "...do nothing but rag on the M3".
Perhaps you should expand your knowledge of the language and look up the word "paragon".
Or, failing that, perhaps you can explain to me how 14/20 in a 3600 pound, four-liter car is actually a terrific achievement.
I look forward to your response.
I agree with the gist of your point...too many defensive folks on here.
One disagreement I have, however, is that the S65 is a wonderful engine. Could it have been better? absolutely. But there is nothing wrong about this high revving 4 liter engine, and although we can get into debates on technical pros/cons, there is a reason why this engine won "engine of the year" in its category 4 years straight.