Originally Posted by Cdnrockies
ignoring the facts.
Your similar case is not similar at all.
Your argument is painfully weak. Zimmerman was told by both the police dispatcher and the organization that he was representing that he should not have pursued or engaged Martin.
You still continue to ignore the comment that is evidence from the dispatch tape.
You're too ignorant to figure out it's not an argument. I'm not arguing for one side or the other, just demonstrating to you that you truly have no idea what happened and are ignorant for believing you do. But you can't even see that and just willfully go on being that way, just go back to believing whatever the media tells you.