Originally Posted by jasonX
Uhm, no. I posted actual events. Try again.
I put these two together just to highlight how you want to talk about truth and logic and make this claim? It was Zioniest terrorism that displaced 100's of thousands of indigenous residents. The illegal migration that was supported byLehi/Irgun which brought tremendous amounts of violence to the region was directly responsible for mass murders, and the British vacating Palestine as they essentially deemed the territory was too hostile.
Please tell me how Zionist's successfully lobbied for more then 50% of Palestine land when Jews accounted for less then 1/3 of the population, which included illegal immigration by European Jews whom have NO ties to the land, whereas the indigenous Pali's who resided in the area for well over a thousand years and made up the majority of the population should get less then 50% of the population?
1800 7 22 246 275
1890 43 57 432 532
1914 94 70 525 689
1922 84 71 589 752
1931 175 89 760 1,033
1947 630 143 1,181 1,970
numbers in thousands
SWEET DEAL SIGN ME UP! However, I'm certain you'll try to use your insane "logic" to justify this as well!
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
2. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government
You need to learn what terrorism means, Irgun was undeniably a terrorist organization. Or maybe you don't consider Hamas a terrorist organization when they shoot rockets into Israel since "because they knew what freedom was and what was right based on the injustice happening in their respective homes"
This is brainwashing at it's finest.
One set of rules for Israel, another for everyone else.
...the last part in bold^ made me LOL, Most truthful thing you have said all night. Id say what you said above was "brainwashing" though lets not forget i am "despicable" LOL
You simultaneously say that you have the correct logic and base on truth yet you deny certain circumstances about every situation so long as its convenient for your case.
Another thing i notice is that in saying Palestinians were pissed about the 50/50 deal, your are saying that they were wronged yet you refuse to admit that the civil war leading to Der Yassin was caused by this civil war which was started by the Arabs in the area according to secular accounts.
You really need to understand more of World history to Understand why the British left.... The British left because they were blowing more and more money to keep control of a society that didn't want them and were being funded back home by someone who didn't car about the area either. They didnt leave because it was too hostile, this is a world superpower were talking about here, dont be glib. They left because it just wasn't worth spending the money on according to the people back home. This was all at a time were money was already tight due to the WWII.
I tell you what, if Hamas bombs military outpost and calls ahead to warn the people of the coming bomb detonation so as to only destroy the complex and not the people than you can compare the two. So long as Hamas is blowing up civilians by design, you cannot.
You seem to think that history dictates that there is entitlement of the land. Last time i checked i live in the USA not the United Native American Indian Tribes of America UNAITA....
Get over it. Jews have history there. Christians have history there. Arabs have history there....Get with the program. The only nations that are ALWAYS in disrepair in this age are middle eastern Arab countries with very few other randoms peppered in.