View Single Post
      08-19-2011, 10:59 AM   #88
Major General
dmboone25's Avatar

Drives: 2017 F80 M3 ZCP/DUC M1200S
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 E92 328i  [0.00]
2007 328i  [0.00]
Originally Posted by SCOTT26 View Post
There is something people are overlooking with the i3 and i8 is that their respective weights are actually significant because they are individually developed models for a purpose.

Now with other manufacturers adapting electrified powertrains to current models their weight goes up and it is not a minimal increase.

What is signifcant for BMW is that they started the CFRP process very early so they took the initial expense hit early now that is in production of a reasonable volume for the M3 and forthcoming M6 Coupe's. BMW M can actually fit the CFRP cost-effectively now to these models.

If Audi or Mercedes-Benz had to do so on the RS5 and C63 respectively they would be more expensive.
So....why is a new M3 $70 grand if you get anything on it?

"Cost-effective" is a relative term...

Back to the topic at hand, all of my BMWs (2 E92 328s, 2 E82 135s) have always "felt" heavy, compared to other cars I have driven. That is part of the overall "feel" of the typical BMW that I like.

I say this because I know that lighter car = better handling. Which would be great, obviously...I just hope that signature "feel" is not lost in the translation, if we are to indeed see real weight savings in future models.
Current - 2015 981 Cayman S
Past rides: 2014 F22 M235 - MT, CWP / 2011 E82 135 - LBM, N55, DCT / 2008 E82 135 - AW, N54, MT
2007 E92 328 - JB, N52, MT, ZSP (traded in for 135)
2007 E92 328 - JB, N52, MT (retired by a drunk driver)